Custom Software Development Company in India

At a glance

Time difference

Same timezone — we are an Indian company based in Surat, Gujarat

Position on Tally

We integrate rather than replace. Tally keeps accounting; we build the operational layer

Statutory scope

GST calculation, statutory invoice formats, GSTIN validation, and e-invoice and e-way bill flows where applicable

Process depth

Job work, multi-location stock, batch and lot tracking, approval chains — modelled rather than approximated

Typical first module

Live in 8 to 10 weeks including data migration and training, then phased from there

Commercial terms

Fixed-scope statement of work with milestone payments, invoiced in INR with GST

Handover

Source code, database, documentation and credentials transfer on final payment

Tally is an incumbent, not an obstacle

Nearly every Indian SME runs accounts in Tally, the CA is fluent in it, and the statutory filing workflow is built around it. Proposing to replace that is a common vendor instinct and almost always a bad trade: you inherit an enormous amount of disruption and risk in exchange for consolidating something that was not causing the problem.

The better boundary is clear. Tally owns accounting and statutory filing. The custom system owns operations — orders, stock, production, job work, dispatch, quality. The two exchange the data that genuinely needs to cross, so nothing is entered twice and the figures reconcile.

Defining that boundary precisely is one of the more valuable parts of discovery, because ambiguity there produces the worst of both worlds: two systems that both half-own the same data and disagree with each other by month end.

Modelling the processes packaged software refuses to

Job work is the clearest example and it is everywhere in Indian manufacturing. Material leaves your premises, is processed by someone else, and returns changed — different weight, sometimes different quantity after rejection. Packaged inventory software treats material leaving as a sale or a write-off, because that is what it was built for, so stock figures stop being trustworthy and the real position moves to a register.

Modelling it properly means representing material you own but do not hold, expected against actual return with an operation-specific tolerance, rejection and rework as distinct outcomes, and vendor-wise pending tracking that is aged. Once that exists, the report your operations team actually wants — what is pending with whom, how old, worth how much — becomes trivial rather than impossible.

The same pattern applies to multi-location stock with inter-unit transfers, to batch and lot tracking where traceability matters, and to approval chains with delegation and escalation. Each is unremarkable engineering that packaged software handles badly and that has to be designed deliberately rather than configured.

How the project runs

1. 1

   Watch the process before designing

   We sit with the people doing the work and observe the actual flow, including the register nobody mentioned and the spreadsheet that holds the real rules.

2. 2

   Draw the Tally boundary explicitly

   We define precisely what stays in accounting and what moves into the operational system, because ambiguity there produces two systems that disagree by month end.

3. 3

   Model the data before the screens

   Job work, stock states, batches and approvals are settled in the data model first. Screens are cheap to change later; a wrong data model is not.

4. 4

   Build statutory flows as core scope

   GST treatment, invoice formats, e-invoice and e-way bill handling including failure states are built in from the start rather than added at the end.

5. 5

   Migrate and reconcile the opening position

   Stock, pending job work and party balances are reconciled against your registers before go-live, because that is what determines whether people trust the system in week one.

6. 6

   Train on site, then phase the next module

   Training happens on your own data, and the next phase is scoped against what using the first one actually taught you.

What you get on every project

• A written scope with fixed milestones before any development starts — no open-ended hourly billing.
• A staging URL you can check at any time, so progress is visible rather than reported.
• One named point of contact, not a ticket queue.
• Invoicing in INR, under Easywork Solutions Private Limited.
• Full source code, design files and hosting credentials transferred to you on final payment.